New York Jury Finds Manufacturer Liable in Latest Talc Ovarian Cancer Trial

A jury in Manhattan agrees with a woman who said that using talc-based baby powder for a long time gave her ovarian cancer

Friday, August 22, 2025 - A New York jury has found a major manufacturer responsible in the most recent baby powder cancer lawsuit. The lawsuit contends that using talc-based powder for a long time caused ovarian cancer. The ruling is another win for the plaintiffs and talcum powder cancer lawyers, who say that firms knew about the possible risks but didn't do enough to warn customers. The woman who was the focus of the case said that using the product regularly for feminine hygiene for many years led directly to her cancer diagnosis. During the trial, the jury saw company papers, expert medical testimony, and scientific research that suggested a possible link between using talc in the perineum and getting cancer. After weeks of discussion, the jury agreed with the plaintiff and said that the manufacturer was careless and should pay for the damages. The ruling is likely to have an impact on continuing and future lawsuits, especially in jurisdictions where identical cases are still going on.

The New York State Unified Court System said in official remarks that the jury's decision was based on what they thought was a solid body of evidence linking long-term usage of talcum powder to ovarian cancer. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other government health officials have not officially said that talc is a cancer-causing substance, but they have admitted that there are gaps in safety data and are looking into the matter. The National Institutes of Health has also said in recent publications that not all talc includes asbestos, but mining can cause cross-contamination, which is very bad for your health. The plaintiff's lawyers in this case cited scientific studies and company documents to demonstrate that the manufacturer knew about early warning signs but nonetheless sold the device without cancer warnings. Doctors and toxicologists also told the jurors how talc particles might get to the ovaries when used in the vaginal area, which could cause inflammation and aberrant cell growth. There are now more than 60,000 claims against talcum powder businesses in the US. This decision adds to the number of court losses for companies that still claim their talc products are safe.

This new verdict in the ongoing talcum powder cancer lawsuit saga might have a big effect on how both manufacturers and regulators deal with worries about consumer safety. Companies are under more and more pressure to either settle claims that are still open or change the way they make their products so they don't have to worry about getting sued again. Baby powder cancer lawyers will probably use this ruling in future cases to show that manufacturers knew about the problem but didn't tell customers enough about it. Outside of court, public health groups are pushing for clearer labeling rules and stricter safety testing before products get on the market. People may also start to switch to talc-free products even more when they learn more about them and the media continues to highlight them. In the long run, this decision makes the case stronger for a national regulation that requires all talc-based goods to have warnings about the risk of cancer. As science, policy, and lawsuits come together, the talc argument might turn into a bigger conversation about how companies are responsible for their actions and how to keep consumers safe in the personal care business.